Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Stacking\s+question\s+\-\s+another\s+reality\s+data\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Stacking\s+question\s+\-\s+another\s+reality\s+data\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Stacking question - another reality data (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 09:31:46 -0700; I have 41 years experience in stacking 2, 3 and 4 Yagi's high. After many hours behind the HFTA and NEC model engines - then putting Yagi's up in the air and using them for many years here at K3LR -; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00230.html (8,261 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking question - another reality data (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 18:50:57 +0200; No, you then get an additional nasty high angle lobe and no difference in gain. 73 Peter,DJ7WW would have been the ticket. Jim VE7RF _______________________________________________ __________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00231.html (7,412 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking question - another reality data (score: 1): Author: john@kk9a.com; Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:32:40 -0400; That is a good question Jim. 72' stacking distance works well with small 40m beams however K3LR's 4el OWA antennas are anything but small. I believe that he has three which puts the top one at 262 fe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00233.html (8,470 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking question - another reality data (score: 1): Author: GMuller885--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 14:46:06 -0400; Some help please. I have a Rohn 36 foot tower. On it I have a Hazer with a 10 foot mast and Ham 4 rotator. I have my modest beam six feet up the mast. I would like to put a 6 meter 4 element beam on; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00236.html (9,556 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]