Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Stacking\s+offset\s+compensation\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Stacking offset compensation (score: 1)
Author: HA3LN <list@ha3ln.hu>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 19:41:26 +0100
Dear All, Turning into the final stage lifting the stacks for 10m and 15m before ARRL-DX contests I need a bit of guidance regarding the feed-line setup. I read in the ARRL Antenna book that if 2x ve
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-12/msg00052.html (8,119 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking offset compensation (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 15:04:17 -0500
Some of my Yagis are on masts and some are on rotating rings so there is some side offset, perhaps 50cm depending on the ring diameter. I have not modeled this offset however my stacks appear to work
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-12/msg00053.html (8,927 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking offset compensation (score: 1)
Author: <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 12:11:26 -0500
I actually did model this a number of years ago. From memory: What matters is the DE line up. 1 to 2 ft was not material. A few tenths of a db. However it started dropping off pretty quickly to as mu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-12/msg00055.html (7,815 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking offset compensation (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@k0xp.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 09:37:08 -0800
Ed, which way did you model it: fore-and-aft, or did you also model side-to-side?? It seems intuitive that if the offset is side-to-side (STS), then the main distortion would be the main lobe would d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-12/msg00056.html (10,258 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking offset compensation (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:25:31 -0800
It's important to remember that this is all frequency-dependent, with its effect proportional to frequency, thus most sensitive on 10M. Free space stacking gain of identical antennas symmetrically fe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-12/msg00057.html (8,147 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking offset compensation (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 18:04:11 -0500
I think the biggest advantage to stacking on HF (over ground) is the wider horizontal pattern. John KK9A Free space stacking gain of identical antennas symmetrically fed is 3 dB with lossless combini
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-12/msg00058.html (7,379 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking offset compensation (score: 1)
Author: <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 17:43:36 -0500
I modeled it as it would be on the tower. About 30 ft separation for 10M yagis and moved the DE up and down the boom. I just looked at gain stacked. Its true that one great advantage of the stack is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-12/msg00059.html (7,645 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking offset compensation (score: 1)
Author: HA3LN <list@ha3ln.hu>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:08:05 +0100
Hi All, HNY to All! Seems my provider went for holidays too, got the replies only yesterday night in bulk. (hope my address is not bouncing ;-) Thanks a lot for the explanations and hints to All. As
/archives//html/Towertalk/2024-01/msg00018.html (10,117 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu