Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Speaking\s+of\s+boom\s+correction\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Speaking\s+of\s+boom\s+correction\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Speaking of boom correction. (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 03:22:35 -0400; I have a pair of stacked C3i 2-meter beams. The boom to mast mount is just a u-bolt with a TV like mast clamp. The boom is fairly small diameter and isn't strong enough to really tighten down on the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00570.html (7,433 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Speaking of boom correction. (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:46:54 +0100; The boom to mast clamp won't affect the resonance of any parasitic element... unless you're implying that one of the elements would have to pass right through your extended mounting plate? -- 73 from; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00571.html (7,806 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Speaking of boom correction. (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:47:41 -0400; Nope, and the mounting plates will be raised by the thickness of the saddle clamps. I',m just going large enough on the plates to keep the things stable on the cross boom. Thanks es 73 Roger (K8RI) _; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00574.html (8,102 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]