- 1. Re: [TowerTalk] Snap-on Ferrites (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 20:00:35 -0700
- He's absolutely correct. Many times I've posted a link to my tutorial on the topic. I spent years learning how this stuff works, and months writing it up. I won't repeat it here. Only the link. k9yc.
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-06/msg00221.html (8,596 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Snap-on Ferrites (score: 1)
- Author: "ve4xt@mymts.net" <ve4xt@mymts.net>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 22:11:31 -0500
- Is it a reference to ferrites that snap on forming only one "turn," or is it applicable to any split ferrite? Does that include eight-turn chokes on Biggest Clamp-on ferrites? 73, kelly, ve4xt Sent f
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-06/msg00224.html (9,396 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Snap-on Ferrites (score: 1)
- Author: EZ Rhino <EZRhino@fastmovers.biz>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 21:13:59 -0600
- Oh and another thing: There are so many generic, un-spec'd snap-on's floating around that we don't know what mix they are, and therefore are no good to us. Hamfests are notorious for this. Chris KF7P
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-06/msg00225.html (8,232 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Snap-on Ferrites (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 23:24:50 -0400
- *ALL* snap-ons are inferior to similarly sized "solid" toroids. The split reduces the ability of the magnetic flux to move through the core because the gap at even the most highly polished split(s).
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-06/msg00227.html (10,478 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] Snap-on Ferrites (score: 1)
- Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 21:00:47 -0700
- I think there are two issues: Is the core material (ferrite grade) the right choice for the job? Most commodity clamp ons sold at flea markets and on ebay aren't specified so may or may not provide t
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-06/msg00230.html (10,407 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TowerTalk] Snap-on Ferrites (score: 1)
- Author: "VE1DT" <emailve1dt@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 02:06:29 -0300
- Jim, While I have reviewed your tutorial many times and there are some areas that I may not yet totally understand, I do find that your standard comment of "read the tutorial" is often less than help
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-06/msg00234.html (8,964 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TowerTalk] Snap-on Ferrites (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 23:33:44 -0700
- On Sun,6/18/2017 10:06 PM, VE1DT wrote: I have again reviewed the tutorial (Rev 6 Dec 2016) and found the paragraph that does indeed repeat what you refer to. I thought that basically only the materi
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-06/msg00235.html (12,633 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TowerTalk] Snap-on Ferrites (score: 1)
- Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 06:39:02 -0700
- Maybe he's referring to the ones you get for VHF/UHF/Part 15 compliance, which are the wrong mix for HF? Is this correct? I was not aware that snap-ons were less effective. John KK9A ________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-06/msg00239.html (8,790 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TowerTalk] Snap-on Ferrites (score: 1)
- Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 10:05:56 -0400
- A lot of the examples on K9YC's site show snap-on ferrites. Also the part numbers for some snap-on models are shown in your "Ferrites useful to hams for suppression and chokes" list. Of course we kno
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-06/msg00241.html (8,228 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TowerTalk] Snap-on Ferrites (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 12:28:07 -0700
- Large type 31 snap on is 2 OD x 1 ID x 1.5 long, which is the same as their solid assy, also 2x1x1.5 Normal solid 2x1x1.5 type 31 is http://www.fair-rite.com/product/round-cable-emi-suppression-cores
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-06/msg00248.html (8,602 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu