Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Slobering\s+Irons\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Slobering\s+Irons\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Slobering Irons (score: 1): Author: Bryan Fields <Bryan@bryanfields.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 16:03:24 -0400; I said it was crap compared to the Metcal, and it is. If you only know the weller, you will think it's awesome. If however you've known a Metcal, you'd call the Weller crap. It's the difference betwe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-07/msg00309.html (10,311 bytes)
22. Re: [TowerTalk] Slobering Irons (score: 1): Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 14:05:20 -0700; Bryan, You missed the point completely. I also object to your calling the Weller "crap". Really uncalled for. No need to call anything crap, that is the issue. We use Weller PS1100C Super Pro's out o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-07/msg00310.html (12,132 bytes)
23. Re: [TowerTalk] Slobering Irons (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:12:48 -0400; But the Wellers are, or were, inexpensive and are adequate for my use. If I were 30 or 40 years younger and had two steady hands I'd want something better for surface mount and DIPs. At 75 they are s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-07/msg00311.html (11,925 bytes)
24. Re: [TowerTalk] Slobering Irons (score: 1): Author: Michael OBrien <k0myw@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 14:15:38 -0700; I'm sure that some of the alternate brands of soldering irons that have been mentioned are fine products. But to describe Weller products as "crap" is contradictory to my experience. When I was getti; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-07/msg00312.html (10,322 bytes)
25. Re: [TowerTalk] Slobering Irons (score: 1): Author: Bryan Fields <Bryan@bryanfields.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 03:44:40 -0400; Who knew people would be this emotionally involved with their choice of soldering iron? Soldering Irons: the third rail of ham radio politics. "It's a Weller, not a choice" I didn't use innuendo, as; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-07/msg00314.html (10,298 bytes)
26. Re: [TowerTalk] Slobering Irons (score: 1): Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:56:56 -0500; Sounds as though the real beauty of the Metcal for PL259 work is that touching the tip to the shell sinks off enough heat the tip falls below its Curie point, which means the tip continues to generat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-07/msg00316.html (13,168 bytes)
27. [TowerTalk] Slobering Irons (score: 1): Author: "Don W7WLL" <w7wll@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:46:23 -0700; Well!!! There seem to be as many opinions on soldering tools as there are about automobiles. As I originally posted, my old old soldering iron bit the dust and my primary use for it was in soldering; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-07/msg00321.html (10,960 bytes)
28. [TowerTalk] Slobering Irons (score: 1): Author: "Joseph Orsak" <w4wn@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 20:18:17 -0400; My 2 cents on soldering guns for PL259's: Decades ago my first job in technology was in the installation bay of a Motorola Service Station. I averaged at least 3 PL-259's a day and no one had heard o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00048.html (7,218 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 28
Page: [1] [2]