Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Simple\s+Dipoles\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Simple\s+Dipoles\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Simple Dipoles (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 15:57:40 -0600; Ok, here is one for you guys .... now don't laugh! I have been making dipoles out of #14 copperweld wire and mounting them at 50 feet on the tower in an inverted vee configuration for years. The feed; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00206.html (8,400 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Simple Dipoles (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Wed, 10 Dec 97 17:20:34 -0500; Use RG-174/U as the feedline. It should improve your bandwidth. (<grin>) I'd be interested to hear your reasons why you hate using a tuner. I don't see any clear solution offhand other than those you; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00207.html (8,852 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Simple Dipoles (score: 1): Author: leeson@ix.netcom.com (Leeson); Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 14:42:17 -0800; For a broadband dipole, try feeding with 1 wavelength of 50 ohm coax and 1/4 wavelength of 75 ohm coax. Connect 50 ohm coax to dipole, connect quarter wave section to other end of 50 ohm section, con; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00210.html (7,743 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Simple Dipoles (score: 1): Author: cebik@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (L. B. Cebik); Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 21:00:11 -0500 (EST); Lee: Re: 40 meter dipoles 50' up Your problem is essentially the same one brought up recently by Dave Leeson. The feedpoint impedance of a dipole for 40 meters at that height is somewhere in the 70-9; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00217.html (8,112 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Simple Dipoles (score: 1): Author: \"Dick Green\"."<dick.green@valley.net ("Dick Green".); Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 22:16:31 -0500; That was easy. Now, how can you broadband a low (say, 60 feet up) 80M dipole or vee enough to cover 3500-3900? Is the "coaxial resonator match" the only route? 73, Dick, WC1M --Original Message-- Fro; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00228.html (9,513 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Simple Dipoles (score: 1): Author: wb6vgi@erols.com (Larry Minnis); Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 21:27:39 -0500; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Robert C. Wilson, published an 2 page article in QST called the "Fat Dipole". His design goal was less than 2:1 SWR from 3.5 to 4.0MHZ with a nominal height of 30 Ft. I; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00270.html (10,502 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Simple Dipoles (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 08:35:01 -0600; Lee... Thanks for the information. I've seen that done before, but always was skeptical about the antenna performance. Does it radiate? Also, I've seen guys who have built similar antennas use fishin; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00376.html (8,621 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]