Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Scotchkote\s+vs\s+Liquid\s+Electrical\s+Tape\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Scotchkote vs Liquid Electrical Tape (score: 1)
Author: "Mark, K5AM" <k5am@zianet.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 03:07:03 +0000
Yes, I agree, 3M Scotchkote is a quite ineffective, nothing like real Liquid Electrical Tape. 73, Mark, K5AM _______________________________________________ __________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00008.html (7,194 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Scotchkote vs Liquid Electrical Tape (score: 1)
Author: Leslie Hooe <hooeld@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 07:26:31 -0500
Has anyone tried Plasti Dip. I used it on my Pro-67 and Rotor last year, However Hurricane Michael cut the test down as it was only up about 6 mo. It did appear to have worked on the rotor when I got
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00012.html (8,609 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Scotchkote vs Liquid Electrical Tape (score: 1)
Author: jrquark via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 09:11:35 -0400
I can only echo Jims suggested procedure. For the first layer, I user Scotch Super 33+ as it is quite compliant to the object that you are wanting to protect. The second layer is with Scotch Super 88
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00013.html (10,780 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu