- 1. [TowerTalk] Shunt Fed Tower (score: 1)
- Author: gbay@odi.com (gbay)
- Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 10:12:14 -0400
- This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0052_01BDDB11.2693F680 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think I'm going to tr
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00183.html (10,200 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Shunt Fed Tower (score: 1)
- Author: "Byron Tatum" <bjtatum@ev1.net>
- Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 14:11:32 -0500
- HelloI plan to shunt feed my 92' model 45-G tower for 160 and 80 meters.Can anyone suggest some good web pages regarding such? I have the book " Low Band DX'ing" and have read the section on shunt fe
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00153.html (7,272 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] SHUNT FED TOWER (score: 1)
- Author: Craig Clark <jcclark@wildblue.net>
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:00:03 -0400
- Series L and shunt C will do the trick. I think it will be step down so the shunt goes on the coax side if I remember correctly. 73, Craig Clark, K1QX RADIOWARE AND RADIO BOOKSTORE PO BOX 209 RINDGE
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00659.html (6,868 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] SHUNT FED TOWER (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 23:01:32 -0400
- You'd think, but when I found my matching networks by trial and error, I couldn't find any matches with the C on the coax side. Both my 160m and 80m networks have the C on the antenna side of the L.
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00683.html (6,898 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] shunt fed tower (score: 1)
- Author: "p.haire" <jhaire@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 10:32:29 -0600
- I am having a problem that I would like to solve. Should a shunt fed tower perform as well on receive as it seems to perform on transmit. Should a shunt fed tower perform on receive as well as a refe
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00229.html (6,493 bytes)
- 6. [TowerTalk] shunt fed tower (score: 1)
- Author: Phil Camera <kb9cry@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 11:52:48 -0600
- Should a shunt fed tower perform on receive as well as a refernce vertical (off center fed or base fed) of the same height as the tower? Assuming radials are the same, Yes. Should a shunt fed tower p
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00230.html (6,898 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TowerTalk] shunt fed tower (score: 1)
- Author: kd4e <kd4e@verizon.net>
- Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 19:00:38 +0500
- Not necessarily. It is somewhat localized. The vertical will often pickup more noise than a horizontal or loop. Can you describe the area around your QTH? Not necessarily. What is in proximity to th
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00238.html (8,126 bytes)
- 8. [TowerTalk] Shunt Fed Tower (score: 1)
- Author: Kelley <kshaddrick@jetup.net>
- Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 16:55:37 -0600
- I'm having some tuning issues with my shunt fed tower. The current configuration is a 48' Rohn HDBX tower with a Cushcraft A3S beam (with the A743 40m add-on kit), a Cushcraft A502S 6m beam, and a 2m
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00077.html (8,097 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TowerTalk] Shunt Fed Tower (score: 1)
- Author: TexasRF@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 19:52:02 EST
- For matching a 25 +j0 load at 1.8 MHz, a 25 ohm reactance can be connected from the measurement point to ground. Then the series capacitor can then be tweaked for resonance and minimum vswr. The shun
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00079.html (9,015 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TowerTalk] Shunt Fed Tower (score: 1)
- Author: Kelley <kshaddrick@jetup.net>
- Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:50:53 -0600
- Thanks for all the replies both on the list and privately. Today, being a beautiful day here in Minnesota, 60 and sunny, I took the afternoon off and ran 8 more radials. It didn't really impact the S
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00105.html (10,356 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu