Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rotator\s+specs\?\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Rotator specs? (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:13:07 EST
Howdy, TowerTalkians -- I'm trying to compare rotator specs and Alfa Radio just threw me a curve. Everything I'd been reading was in in-lbs until I came to the AR website that listed the specs in Lb-
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00117.html (7,651 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator specs? (score: 1)
Author: "B. Nowak" <n8snm@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:27:59 -0500
The specs are the same. This is a common mistake made with units for torque. Technically, the correct unit would be Lb-In for English units. Newton-Meters (Nm) for SI units. -- ______________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00118.html (8,982 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator specs? (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:36:13 -0800
I'm not very close to being an engineer, either, but I'm a physicist by training, so I'll have a go at the question. Quick answer : no difference. When one applies a force on the end of a lever in or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00119.html (8,196 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator specs? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Aycock" <baycock@hughes.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 20:03:22 -0600
They are the same. The best utility for conversion is CONVERT by Josh Madison. Bill-W4BSG _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mai
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00121.html (8,881 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator specs? (score: 1)
Author: "W3YY" <w3yy@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:48:10 -0800
Steve - I saw some replies, but am not sure anyone fully explained the reason why lb-ins is the same as in-lbs. Here's why: When you see some numerical result with two concatenated units, like inch-p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00128.html (9,156 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu