Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Roof\s+Counterpoise\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Roof\s+Counterpoise\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Roof Counterpoise (score: 1): Author: Jason Reber <jreber@thebluezone.net>; Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 09:53:26 -0700; Greetings Everyone I would like to set up a vertical antenna at my QTH, but my small backyard is arranged such that it is impossible to set up a good radial system. In addition, my house is right in; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00227.html (7,096 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Roof Counterpoise (score: 1): Author: "w4ZW" <w4zw@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:10:27 -0500; Best solution is to configure it as a ground plane vertical. They work very well indeed. Cut 4 pieces of regular telephone cable for a 1/4 wave on the longest band. Measure from the vertical base poi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00228.html (9,702 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Roof Counterpoise (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 16:46:39 -0500; Hi, Jason.... your idea will definitely work... no doubt about it. You will be able to radiate RF well enough to make it well worth trying. Beyond that, it's the sort of thing you simply have to try; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00238.html (10,055 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Roof Counterpoise (score: 1): Author: kd4e <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 16:50:16 -0500; Will you be running more than 100W? I know with a wire counterpoise to a longwire antenna one is warned to be sure the ends are insulated due to potential sparks. I am guessing that the energy is mor; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00239.html (7,943 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Roof Counterpoise (score: 1): Author: "Trent and Lorraine" <vk4ti@sampson.net.au>; Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:06:46 +1000; Hi Jason, I used a vertical mast mounted here for the last five years and it works fine, the one thing to take into consideration is almost every backyard style installation on HF is a compromise eve; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00241.html (9,388 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Roof Counterpoise (score: 1): Author: "AA6DX - Mark" <aa6dx@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 19:40:59 -0800; What works easier ... aluminum foil .. `ties cheap at COSTCO and the likes .. easy to staple, bend, etc.. hint .. don't cut at the end of runs, simply fold over like a Christmas wrap and come back th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00249.html (9,062 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Roof Counterpoise (score: 1): Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:35:36 -0500; Jason, I missed your original post on this. When I first moved to NJ, I wasn't aloud too have a tower on our development. I knew I was going to be in that house only several months. So drilled a hole; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00291.html (11,537 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]