- 1. Re: [TowerTalk] Romex for rotor (score: 1)
- Author: jcjacobsen@q.com
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 22:34:16 -0500 (EST)
- The current question on the table is Romex for Rotors... in conduit.. Jim Lux, said in part: <snip> But there's no rule about Type NM (Romex) in conduit... <snip> I think if you read more closely you
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00020.html (7,157 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Romex for rotor (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 20:19:41 -0800
- good point. I don't usually pull romex, but individual strands _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contest
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00023.html (7,200 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Romex for rotor (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 07:36:50 -0500
- The difference in construction between NMB and UFB is profound. The NMB I have seen has a jacket around individual conductors, each of which is covered by what seems to be paper insulation. The UFB i
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00032.html (8,573 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Romex for rotor (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Jones" <n6sj@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 11:51:33 -0800
- Thanks to everyone for the very useful inputs on rotor cable! Vy 73, Steve N6SJ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00070.html (7,118 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu