- 1. [TowerTalk] Rohn HDBX 48 tower (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Ferguson" <Paul@PaulFerguson.us>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 09:53:05 -0400
- I am putting up a Rohn HDBX 48 foot tower. I will put a 3 element SteppIR on it. The SteppIR specs are 42 lbs, 6.1 square feet of maximum wind load, and 16 foot boom. The HDBX 48 antenna load specs a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00534.html (7,679 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn HDBX 48 tower (score: 1)
- Author: "KA9OFM John Garrett" <ka9ofm@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 13:12:33 -0500
- I'm not familiar with the Rohn HDBX 48 ft tower, but the only advantage that I ever saw to having your rotor located at the bottom of the tower was just the fact that you didn't need to climb the tow
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00540.html (10,351 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Rohn HDBX 48 tower (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Ferguson" <Paul@PaulFerguson.us>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:32:38 -0400
- I am putting up a Rohn HDBX 48 foot tower. I will put a 3 element SteppIR on it. The SteppIR specs are 42 lbs, 6.1 square feet of maximum wind load, and 16 foot boom. The HDBX 48 specs for antennas a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00567.html (9,280 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu