Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rohn\s+25\s+vs\s+45\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rohn\s+25\s+vs\s+45\s+\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 vs 45 ? (score: 1): Author: dshoaf@Mondobaking.com (Dennis Shoaf); Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1999 11:51:23 -0400; I am in the planning process of putting up a 130' tower in NE Alabama. I will put up a M2 3 ele 40 mtr yagi atop. I want to put up Rohn 45, but my budget may not allow it (only 3k in budget). Can I s; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00105.html (7,615 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 vs 45 ? (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 01:29:10 -0400; On Mon, 5 Apr 1999 11:51:23 -0400 "Dennis Shoaf" <dshoaf@Mondobaking.com> writes: Well I wont comment about published Rohn specs but I had a KLM 4el 40M and a 4el CC for 10M 10' above that on 140' of; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00114.html (10,250 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 vs 45 ? (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 20:23:14 EDT; Unfortunately a transit requires a moderate learning curve and money for rental. TIA-222 specs say that you can be out three inches in 100 feet and you can eyeball it that close. While I've used a bu; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00133.html (7,803 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 vs 45 ? (score: 1): Author: Rick.Wells@digital.com (Rick Wells); Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 21:17:41 -0400; Another comment in favor of Rohn 45G, it is *very* comfortable to climb, i.e., stand on. Can even get two people on opposite sides of the tower at the same height with an inch to spare. I really enjo; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00198.html (8,565 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]