Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rohn\s+25\s+as\s+a\s+boom\s+pole\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rohn\s+25\s+as\s+a\s+boom\s+pole\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 as a boom pole (score: 1): Author: Bruce Ward <Bruce@IPIntel.com>; Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 13:19:38 -0500; Has anyone used Rohn 25 section(s) instead of a boom pole on top of a larger tower? I have a Tri-EX HZN 471 that the previous owner configured to lift to 66' instead of the factory 71'. He also used; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-05/msg00071.html (8,119 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 as a boom pole (score: 1): Author: Bruce Ward <Bruce@IPIntel.com>; Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 13:23:54 -0500; PS, I have pictures of the tower online at http://pics.2ward.com/family/index.php?ALBUM=Tower _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-05/msg00072.html (9,042 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 as a boom pole (score: 1): Author: Hector Garcia XE2K <j_hector_garcia@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 11:55:58 -0700 (PDT); Bruce I just take a look at your photos, those ubiquiti looking equipment is very light for sure, pure plastic, will be no problem in the wind load, from my point of view the 120 pound extra weight f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-05/msg00073.html (10,764 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 as a boom pole (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 13:05:43 -0400 (EDT); larger tower? Please explain what a "boom pole" is. I don't know what that means. Do you mean a mast, which is a round pipe sticking out of the top of the tower where the rotatable antennas are moun; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-05/msg00107.html (10,265 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]