Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Replacing\s+coax\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Replacing\s+coax\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Replacing coax (score: 1): Author: "Tom Martin" <tmartin@chartermi.net>; Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:41:01 -0500; I am replacing a 90' length of RG8 water damaged coax to my 40 meter beam. I have LMR 400 for the main run up the tower but want to use a RG8 section for the rotator loop. There are two ways to do th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00227.html (7,568 bytes)
2. RE: [TowerTalk] Replacing coax (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:08:41 -0500; I like to use a single piece of RG213 from the antenna feed point (balun or other matching device) to the tower coax. If you prefer, LMR 400 comes in a flexible version also, and RG8 is certainly acc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00229.html (9,527 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Replacing coax (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:24:29 EDT; I believe there was a W5 a while back with too much time on his hands who put a whole string of barrel and/or T-connectors together and found that the loss 10 or 13 (?) at HF was less than .1 dB. I t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00230.html (7,489 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Replacing coax (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:48:15 -0400; about .1 dB on 40 As Keith says, it indeed would be under .1dB .1dB loss would be 2.3% of the applied power. 2.3% of 1500 watts would be 34.5 watts. A UHF barrel connector would get red hot inside w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00231.html (8,204 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]