Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Reduced\s+size\s+four\-squares\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Reduced\s+size\s+four\-squares\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Reduced size four-squares? (score: 1): Author: Ian White G/GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 15:35:22 +0100; limitation. Jim Lux replied: [...] [...] ...and there the topic ended. Could I revive it with a slightly different question, please? I'm planning a 40m 4-square on a lot that isn't quite big enough.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00227.html (9,963 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Reduced size four-squares? (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 11:26:14 -0700; Asymmetric radials do NOT imply asymmetric patterns. There's some recent articles in QEX or QST where extensive modeling was done with all sorts of radial arrangements. Asymmetric radials will change; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00239.html (10,724 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]