- 1. [TowerTalk] Re: steppir radio interface (score: 1)
- Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:42:26 -0800 (PST)
- Yes, but the SteppIR retunes every 25KHz. Suppose I am tuning around 14.025. Every time I jump over the "retune point" the controller starts running the stepper motors. There appears to be no (or ver
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00392.html (8,604 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: steppir radio interface (score: 1)
- Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 01:15:45 +0000
- N6KJ added: Yes, but the SteppIR retunes every 25KHz. Suppose I am tuning around 14.025. Every time I jump over the "retune point" the controller starts running the stepper motors. And you then hear
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00398.html (8,784 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Re: steppir radio interface (score: 1)
- Author: edoc <kd4e@arrl.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:32:18 -0500
- And you then hear something & call it, transmitting into the antenna whilst it's tuning. D'oh! Kelly later mentions leaving the antenna where it was after a band change, as one might only be having a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00400.html (8,711 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: steppir radio interface (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:33:48 -0800
- commonly Seems like the autotuning interface feature needs a "hold" switch added for those situations where autotuning is a nuisance rather than a feature :) 73 de Mike, W4EF............. __________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00402.html (8,602 bytes)
- 5. Re:[TowerTalk] Re: steppir radio interface (score: 1)
- Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
- Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 03:21:00 +0000
- KD4E suggested: Why not just stack a Cushcraft D4 or similar 10-14-20-40M dipole above or below the Steppir beam for band scanning? That way there is no problem with listening as the Steppir remains
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00415.html (8,001 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: steppir radio interface (score: 1)
- Author: edoc <kd4e@arrl.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 23:11:48 -0500
- VR2BrettGraham wrote: KD4E suggested: Why not just stack a Cushcraft D4 or similar 10-14-20-40M dipole above or below the Steppir beam for band scanning? That way there is no problem with listening a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00416.html (8,713 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: steppir radio interface (score: 1)
- Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
- Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 15:25:44 +0000
- KD4E replied: I don't understand. The SteppIR requires tuning, the D4 does not. That makes the D4 (or something like it) the perfect adjunct to the SteppIR. Another option might be a vertical to list
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00423.html (9,054 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu