- 1. [TowerTalk] Re: Yagis (score: 1)
- Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
- Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 07:52:09 -0500
- There never is Pete. Actually the gain is quite good, because the real null is intentionally moved up at a useful wave angle. It is only when the null is placed directly off the back in a small endf
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00107.html (8,653 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Re: Yagis (score: 1)
- Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
- Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 09:06:59 -0500
- No, but I wonder how they relate to F/R bandwidth, gain bandwidth and SWR bandwidth. A lot of work has been done to get all three of these in reasonable balance, and I don't recall any 3-element solu
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00108.html (8,882 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Re: Yagis (score: 1)
- Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
- Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 11:47:31 -0500
- If you want truly wide-band performance...forget a Uda-yagi antenna. Its primary advantage is simplicity, not bandwidth or performance. In a purely endfire array drive all the elements with cross-fi
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00111.html (9,882 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Re: Yagis (score: 1)
- Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
- Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 13:11:36 -0500
- ... Sure, but that was precisely my point. No point in optimizing for super-deep F/R nulls, particularly if the trade-off is gain bandwidth or SWR bandwidth (or F/R bandwidth for that matter). I'm no
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00113.html (9,071 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] Re: Yagis (score: 1)
- Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
- Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 22:27:03 -0500
- A point was made that yagis with single reflectors have maximum F/R ratio's in the order of 20-25 dB (or something similar), and I simply pointed out that isn't factual and gave an example of an ant
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00118.html (8,662 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu