Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Upcoming\s+Compliance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Upcoming\s+Compliance\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: Upcoming Compliance (score: 1): Author: w5hvv@aeneas.net (Roderick M. Fitz-Randolph); Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 15:43:43 -0600; On Fri, 14 Nov 1997, Ward Silver wrote in regards to the upcoming RF compliance: _______________________________________________________________________ Several things pop into mind as I read this: (; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00355.html (12,199 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Re: Upcoming Compliance (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 13:02:02 -0800 (PST); Only if the wire is VERY CLOSE to uncontrolled exposures - which translates to "don't put it up over your neighbor's property"...I think the recommended separations were on the order of 10-20 feet (g; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00356.html (10,254 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Re: Upcoming Compliance (score: 1): Author: harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole); Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 16:17:33 -0500 (EST); When I see how many powerful vested interests have RF emissions as a big part of their game-- tv stations, police radios, aircraft, etc etc -- I stop worrying about compliance for hams. k4VUD -- FAQ; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00357.html (9,275 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Re: Upcoming Compliance (score: 1): Author: bigdon@eskimo.com (Big Don); Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 17:01:58 -0800 (PST); The antennas aren't generally ~100' from a neighbor's house... Big Don -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towert; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00373.html (9,486 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Re: Upcoming Compliance (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 15:15:05 -1000; No, but the most powerful are atop many hotels, especially out here in Waikiki!! Have often wondered how many tourists are aware of the immense amount of RF surrounding them at, for example, the Hilt; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00375.html (9,940 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Re: Upcoming Compliance (score: 1): Author: wrt@eskimo.com (Bill Turner); Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 02:33:42 GMT; There is a RF safety calculator available at: http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/kharker/rfsafety/ I can't personally vouch for the accuracy - perhaps someone else can? But if it's correct, very few of u; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00382.html (8,868 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Re: Upcoming Compliance (score: 1): Author: dietz@texas.net (Chuck Dietz); Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 21:20:41 -0600; Good link, Bill. The FCC rules also say existing Amateur facilities must be in compliance by September 1, 2000. I think this thread is highly topical to an antenna reflector as long as we don't bore; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00383.html (10,122 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Re: Upcoming Compliance (score: 1): Author: harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole); Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 22:59:46 -0500 (EST); Big Don, the police car is in front of my house at "people" level, the taxi same, the cel phone is half inch from my pea brain, the garage door opener is inside the auto with me, the 100megawatts (TV; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00387.html (9,752 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Re: Upcoming Compliance (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 22:23:17 -0800 (PST); The coax probably takes care of that function for free :-) 73, Ward N0AX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: tow; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00388.html (8,745 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] Re: Upcoming Compliance (score: 1): Author: FSWF37A@prodigy.com ( JAMES T BRANNIGAN); Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 06:26:26, -0500; Charles, I agree with your assessment, however logic and government do not compute.. The government did try to control "strong distilled drink" and has spent billions to try and control illicit drugs; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00389.html (9,552 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] Re: Upcoming Compliance (score: 1): Author: bigdon@eskimo.com (Big Don); Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 05:49:08 -0800 (PST); Hey, I tried it, this works real slick. A couple of points, tho. There are different allowables for "Controlled" and "Uncontrolled" environments. I couldn't find where those terms were defined. Also,; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00391.html (9,628 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] Re: Upcoming Compliance (score: 1): Author: dietz@texas.net (Chuck Dietz); Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 14:11:18 -0600; The definitions of "controlled" and "uncontrolled" environments are in the Bulletin 65 posted on the internet at an address listed in the second paragraph of the RF Safety Calculator at http://www.cs; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00404.html (11,252 bytes)
13. [TowerTalk] Re: Upcoming Compliance (score: 1): Author: sawyers@inav.net (Steve Sawyers n0yvy); Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 14:23:24 -0600; Simple definition: Controlled is inside your property line. Uncontrolled is outside your property. de n0yvy steve -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@con; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00405.html (10,750 bytes)
14. [TowerTalk] Re: Upcoming Compliance (score: 1): Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths); Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 03:56:20 -0800 (PST); How about ground-mounted verticals that are used for transmitting all the time? How about four squares? You can walk right up and touch the radiating element . . . Stan w7ni@teleport.com -- FAQ on W; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00438.html (10,109 bytes)
15. [TowerTalk] Re: Upcoming Compliance (score: 1): Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths); Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 03:56:24 -0800 (PST); I take no comfort in this. There are many many examples of "powerful vested interests" managing to get themselves exempt from rules and regulations the rest of us have to comply with. Hey, already h; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00439.html (8,982 bytes)
16. [TowerTalk] Re: Upcoming Compliance (score: 1): Author: scotty@advicom.net (Scott Neustadter); Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 17:14:56 -0600; Check the latest Novice/Tech license manual (Question Pool) It has numerous examples of common antenna setups and powers for both controlled and uncontrolled limits (See Graphic NT0-1, which is used; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00453.html (12,525 bytes)
17. [TowerTalk] Re: Upcoming Compliance (score: 1): Author: alsopb@vance.net (alsopb@vance.net); Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 09:06:02 -0500; Guys, I'm curious about the RF safety calculator assumptions. The area of interest in in the "near field" My understanding is that calculating near field field strengths is a big task. The antenna pa; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00485.html (9,415 bytes)
18. [TowerTalk] Re: Upcoming Compliance (score: 1): Author: jmarchand@ecrm.com (MarchandJohn); Date: 18 Nov 1997 12:11:36 -0400; Hi Brian, I ran that RF Safety program for every radio/antenna/pwr level on every piece of equipment I own (160mtr-450mhz, including mobiles) and didn't come anywhere close to the controlled/uncontro; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00488.html (9,831 bytes)
19. [TowerTalk] Re: Upcoming Compliance (score: 1): Author: sawyers@inav.net (Steve Sawyers n0yvy); Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 17:07:15 -0600; Controlled is inside your property line. Uncontrolled is outside your property line. de n0yvy steve -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Ad; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00499.html (8,292 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]