Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+STACKING\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+STACKING\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: STACKING (score: 1): Author: Martin Ewing <martin@aa6e.net>; Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 22:39:00 -0400; Seems to me you should be able to nearly eliminate the interaction by setting your 15 m beam azimuth 90 degrees offset from your 40 m beam. (Assuming the booms aren't resonant!) Complicates your poin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00168.html (7,141 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: STACKING (score: 1): Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 00:16:24 -0400; Turning 90 degrees does not always work out, because sometimes booms can behave as dipoles with end loading and can weird the patterns just as much running the antennas in-line. 73, Guy. by beam. jus; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00170.html (8,814 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]