- 1. [TowerTalk] Re: MFJ 259 (score: 1)
- Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom)
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 07:26:39 -0500
- BCI tell It isn't a modification, it's a separate external notch and "transparent" band-pass filter all in one box (patent pending). Since it is a three day project to design and a three day project
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00928.html (7,557 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Re: MFJ 259 (score: 1)
- Author: zeitler@ibm.net (zeitler@ibm.net)
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 08:45:02 -0800
- Hi Tom et al, PLEASE let us know when this is ready for sale. I too at times have problems here in San Diego with my 259 (plain). Lane Zeitler KM3G San Diego John 3:3 <>< --Original Message-- From: w
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00935.html (8,685 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Re: MFJ 259 (score: 1)
- Author: babblarr@cwis.isu.edu (Larry R. Babb)
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 10:09:40 -0700
- Hi everyone, Please confirm that this will be an "outboard" box that will be an addon that will be compatible with the MFJ259B series. If this is additional circuitry that will be internal to future
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00936.html (10,134 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Re: MFJ 259 (score: 1)
- Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom)
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 12:51:33 -0500
- problems I'll let you know. It is an external box, and will work with any analyzer. 73 Tom -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administra
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00938.html (7,185 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] Re: MFJ 259 (score: 1)
- Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 17:55:51 GMT
- What say Tom? Would seem that having this as an outboard device would be better. If it's internal, then there would be "blind spots" when doing stuff like measuring electrical length of coax, etc. Pu
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00940.html (10,922 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu