Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+F12\s+customer\s+service\s+and\s+antenna\s+refurbishment\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+F12\s+customer\s+service\s+and\s+antenna\s+refurbishment\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: F12 customer service and antenna refurbishment (score: 1): Author: "Didier Juges" <didier@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:20:02 -0600; At least, it seems my concerns about the relative youg age of the F12 company (compared to the others), were unfounded, as I have not seen any negative comment about robustness. I bought the beam rep; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00326.html (9,805 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: F12 customer service and antenna refurbishment (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 07:06:11 -0500; At 09:20 PM 12/11/03 -0600, Didier Juges wrote: I bought the beam report from N0AX and K7LXC, and the Force 12 antennas certainly blow the competition away. The only measureable advantage of my 24' b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00328.html (9,674 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]