Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]Leading\s+zero\s+on\s+SSB\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]Leading\s+zero\s+on\s+SSB\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: [CQ-Contest]Leading zero on SSB (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:36:41 EST; I can live with the "please copy" guys. Even the "good luck" is cool. Lots of the old timers from the 50s still use "please accept" or "please take." However, in my 25+ years of doing SS, I have neve; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00464.html (7,888 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [CQ-Contest]Leading zero on SSB (score: 1): Author: "Richard M. Gillingham" <rmoodyg@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:48:48 -0500; Dunno if you sent this to the right reflector, but in reply, at least they're trying... Lots zero, KC9XYZ find checks Some whole Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00465.html (8,743 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [CQ-Contest]Leading zero on SSB (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 13:08:33 -0800; I'd argue that phrases like "please copy" and leading zeros are designed to standardize the form of the communication, much as prosigns do in CW or headers in digital comm do. The "please copy" lets; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00466.html (11,304 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]