Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Amps\]\s+Relays\s+for\s+RF\s+switching\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: [Amps] Relays for RF switching (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 07:03:13 -0400
At 01:11 AM 4/15/04, Vic wrote: I needed a remote (indoor) antenna switching unit, and since I had everything I needed in my junkbox, I decided to build it instead of paying $140+ to Ameritron. I use
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00311.html (8,776 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [Amps] Relays for RF switching (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 08:48:07 -0400
I've seen large open frame 30 amp relays overheat at 1500 watts. The low frequency AC or DC switching rating of a relay has almost nothing to do with how suitable it is for RF applications. I have s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00317.html (8,556 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [Amps] Relays for RF switching (score: 1)
Author: "Geoff" <geoffrey@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 09:42:34 -0400
I believe the key to handling QRO is in the construction of the relay. Contacts are often just staked to the arms, this makes for poor RF contact. A bit of silver solder works well, probably regular
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00328.html (10,441 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [Amps] Relays for RF switching (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 13:27:40 -0400
Please don't take this as argumentative, but I disagree with most of this. I've never seen a problem from contact staking, and can't imagine one occuring. After all, the relay depends on a small cont
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00331.html (10,341 bytes)

5. RE: [TowerTalk] Re: [Amps] Relays for RF switching (score: 1)
Author: "Tod Olson" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 16:36:12 -0500
Tom: Any thoughts about what things cause the differences you observe? to do with how suitable it is for RF >applications. Tom, how does one read the catalog specifications and somehow decided "that
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00337.html (8,466 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [Amps] Relays for RF switching (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 18:37:51 -0400
observe? Sure. When relays are designed manufacturers and engineers don't think about HF signals. Even if they did know the end use, most don't understand what to watch for. somehow decided "that on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00341.html (8,635 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [Amps] Relays for RF switching (score: 1)
Author: "Geoff" <geoffrey@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 20:50:14 -0400
<i>Please don't take this as argumentative, but I disagree with most of this.</i> Why am I not suprised? <i>I've never seen a problem from contact staking, and can't imagine one occuring. After all,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00344.html (10,176 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [Amps] Relays for RF switching (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 23:01:49 -0400
distorting the there will be takes is a It has nothing to do with grain struture. It isn't a temper issue. It has to do with expanding the metal in a pressure fit area and then letting it cool, and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00347.html (12,204 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [Amps] Relays for RF switching (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 20:07:12 -0700
Amost all of the interconnects in the ETO Alpha 78 RF deck are made with silver plated copper braid. Most of them are flooded with solder so that they are essentially rigid, but the connections betwe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00348.html (10,114 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [Amps] Relays for RF switching (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 23:21:25 -0400
The difference is important if braid size is limited. If you can use any size braid, then you just size up until the stuff doesn't melt. As for the tube connections, current is pretty low at the ano
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00349.html (10,446 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [Amps] Relays for RF switching (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 21:55:10 -0700
Do you think the resistivity of the solder makes any significant difference to the resistivity of the flooded braid, Tom. When I rebuilt the RF deck in W6UE's Alpha 78 (someone cooked the bandswitch
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00350.html (11,009 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [Amps] Relays for RF switching (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 06:10:06 -0700
If you're truly interested in reducing the losses and parasitic L, then you could always look into Litz wire. It's available from specialty wire companies like MWS (in Westlake Village, CA) and other
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00354.html (12,045 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [Amps] Relays for RF switching (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 09:18:13 EDT
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE take your AMPS pissing contests back to AMPS and quit posting them to TowerTalk. Thank you. Cheers, Steve K7LXC TT ADMIN _______________________________________________ See: ht
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00355.html (8,611 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [Amps] Relays for RF switching (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 09:31:37 -0400
I've never used it, so I don't know. The largest problem isn't the resitivity of the materials, it is the construction. Cable manufacturers use special lays of weave to minimize the "in and out" and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00356.html (10,408 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu