Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[AMPS\]\s+Dollars\s+per\s+dB\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[AMPS\]\s+Dollars\s+per\s+dB\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: [AMPS] Dollars per dB (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1999 10:19:37 -0600; Dollars per dB is a good way to look at optimizing station design for a fixed or limited budget. The tradeoffs can get quite complex and require ACCURATE and COMPLETE data. Don't forget the cost of a; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00005.html (9,151 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Re: [AMPS] Dollars per dB (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 17:08:00 +0000; ... I would argue, as well, thatit is fallacious (as K2UVG did) to count double for antenna dB, on the theory that they help both transmit and receive -- my own belief is that below 6 meters, and may; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00009.html (8,820 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]