Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rain\s+static\s+top\s+vs\s+bottom\s+antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rain\s+static\s+top\s+vs\s+bottom\s+antennas\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Rain static top vs bottom antennas (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 07:56:58 EDT; Way back in the 60's and 70's an Elmer of mine (W8VWQ) told me communications antennas at the very top of structures would wipe out from noise during foul weather and to always side mount antennas. H; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00007.html (7,474 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Rain static top vs bottom antennas (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 06:42:42 -0700; Same water, but the charge on the drops might be different. Also, if the p-static is coming from the top of the tower where the E field is higher(as opposed to the antenna), then the lower antenna, b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00016.html (7,782 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]