Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Radials\,\s+elevated\,\s+or\s+otherwise\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Radials\,\s+elevated\,\s+or\s+otherwise\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Radials, elevated, or otherwise (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:45:58 -0000; Folks, I'm going to disagree with Jim, on two points. 1) Early work done by consulting engineers, using elevated radials (10'), in place of 120 buried radials indicated that field strength at 1 mile; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00212.html (8,521 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials, elevated, or otherwise (score: 1): Author: "Tim Makins, EI8IC" <contesting@eircom.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 08:23:33 -0000; I wonder what the difference is, at those heights, between a GP as you describe, and a vertical dipole ? Seems to me that if you take half a standard dipole for the top bit, and half a fan dipole for; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00214.html (7,856 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials, elevated, or otherwise (score: 1): Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:25:13 -1000; Hi, ref questions about elevated dipoles: Here is an excellent photo of exactly the sort of antenna you describe: http://www.boulder.nist.gov/timefreq/images/radiostations/ wwvh-large/wwvh5.jpg _____; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00221.html (8,396 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials, elevated, or otherwise (score: 1): Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:37:50 -1000; Hi, ref questions about elevated dipoles: Here is an excellent photo of exactly the sort of antenna you describe: http://www.boulder.nist.gov/timefreq/images/radiostations/ wwvh-large/wwvh5.jpg you m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00222.html (9,987 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials, elevated, or otherwise (score: 1): Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:49:13 -1000; Ref: my post which contained this photo link: Clicking just on the highlighted line above takes you to a page with a long list of photos. Look down the list and click on: wwvh-large This brings up an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00223.html (8,432 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials, elevated, or otherwise (score: 1): Author: "Tim Makins, EI8IC" <contesting@eircom.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 09:52:19 -0000; That's a great example - thanks for sharing, Jim. 73s Tim EI8IC _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00236.html (10,682 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]