Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RG\-149\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RG\-149\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] RG-149 (score: 1): Author: Mike VE3YF <Mike@ve3yf.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:25:40 +0000; Hi: I have a chance to pickup some RG-149 brand new for almost free. The difference from the specs of RG-213 is that it is 52 Ohm, the rest of the specs that I can find are the same as RG-213. Howeve; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00230.html (7,101 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-149 (score: 1): Author: "Peter FORBES" <prforbes@bigpond.net.au>; Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:58:38 +1100; Mike, Isn't RG-149 75 ohm cable? Cheers Peter VK3QI Hi: I have a chance to pickup some RG-149 brand new for almost free. The difference from the specs of RG-213 is that it is 52 Ohm, the rest of the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00232.html (8,588 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-149 (score: 1): Author: Dan Hearn <n5ardxcc@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:10:04 -0800; My Times Wire and Cable catalog says it is 75 ohm -- Dan Hearn N5AR _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00233.html (9,723 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-149 (score: 1): Author: "Peter FORBES" <prforbes@bigpond.net.au>; Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:13:59 +1100; Absolutely. The specs on it are: inner conductor 7 strands with diameter of 0.048 - this is similar to RG216 which is also 75 ohm. Mike, you need to check the dimensions with a micrometer - that will; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00234.html (11,098 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-149 (score: 1): Author: Mike VE3YF <Mike@ve3yf.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 00:21:13 +0000; I checked with the person who has the cable and he says it is 52ohm and I also checked the interenet and found that it is listsd on some websites as 52 ohm and other websites 75ohm. This is the rathe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00235.html (7,700 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-149 (score: 1): Author: "Peter FORBES" <prforbes@bigpond.net.au>; Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:04:19 +1100; Yes Mike, I am not sure, but I seem to remember that this topic has come up before when a cheap source of such cable came on the surplus market. The only way to be sure is to measure the diameter of; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00236.html (9,467 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] RG-149 (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:14:54 -0800; However, Mosely still blathers to this day about... establishing resonance and keeps quoting 52 ohms. To test for sure, put a 75 ohm resistor on one end of a short piece of the proposed cable.....and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00237.html (6,994 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-149 (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:44:03 -0500; It is probably 75 ohm cable which is useful for phasing lines, feeding RX antennas and even dipoles. If it is nearly free I would pick it up! John KK9A Hi: 73 De Mike VE3YF http://www.ve3yf.com _____; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00239.html (7,706 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-149 (score: 1): Author: Mike VE3YF <Mike@ve3yf.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 09:15:32 +0000; Tnx Guys: I am going to have the current owner double and perhaps triple check with the old fashioned method. The more I listen hear and the internet, it has to be 75 ohm cable and not 52 ohm. The co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00249.html (8,062 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-149 (score: 1): Author: "Peter FORBES" <prforbes@bigpond.net.au>; Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 20:54:49 +1100; Hi Mike, It might be worth searching through the forum archives, as I am pretty sure that this topic has come up before. Mind you, it may have been on another forum. Once you know the diameter of the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00250.html (10,160 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-149 (score: 1): Author: <aa6dx@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:20:44 -0800; Try here ... http://www.zianet.com/ebear/coaxlist.html 52 ohm, low noise .. 73 es Merry Christmas .. Mark, AA6DX Hi Mike, It might be worth searching through the forum archives, as I am pretty sure t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00268.html (11,570 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]