Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RFU\-503\s+Was\:\s+quick\s+waterproofing\s+for\s+PL\-259connectors\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RFU\-503\s+Was\:\s+quick\s+waterproofing\s+for\s+PL\-259connectors\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] RFU-503 Was: quick waterproofing for PL-259connectors? (score: 1): Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:10:02 -0800; interesting Martin. Good feedback. Surprisingly, I've found *no* references to hams using these. (on the web) I noticed the rf in industries engineering drawing at http://rfsearch.rfindustries.com/dr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00229.html (12,045 bytes)
2. RE: [TowerTalk] RFU-503 Was: quick waterproofing for PL-259connectors? (score: 1): Author: "Martin Sole" <msole@loxinfo.co.th>; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:51:53 +0700; I have not used the specified heatshrink on these connectors but just sealed them in the usual way. The 'built in' weather proofing I would only consider minimal. That said I have a couple of N conne; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00233.html (13,931 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]