Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RFI\s+Radius\s+vs\s+Ant\s+Height\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] RFI Radius vs Ant Height (score: 1)
Author: "Pat Barthelow" <aa6eg@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:17:23 -0700
Its been a very long time since I ran an HF KW from a residence. At a new QTH, I am contemplating doing so, using a yagi on a tower, say at 60 ft. I am now at a fairly dense subdivision, shown here o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00036.html (8,402 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI Radius vs Ant Height (score: 1)
Author: "David Hachadorian" <k6ll@adelphia.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 01:22:30 -0000
It looks like your electric and cable lines are underground in that neighborhood. That is good. I guess there is no restriction on towers. That is also good. I think you have hit upon the perfect cit
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00043.html (8,888 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI Radius vs Ant Height (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 18:32:44 -0700
You will soon be meeting a lot of your neighbors. I had the same situation and it was more than unpleasant. In fact, that is one of the main reasons I moved 99% of my operations to RTTY. Of all the c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00047.html (8,597 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI Radius vs Ant Height (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on TowerTalk" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 21:48:17 -0400
If you run it through an RF calculator you will find the higher you go the smaller the circle at ground level for a given intensity. OTOH for some strange reason the number of RFI complaints seems t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00050.html (8,264 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI Radius vs Ant Height (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 19:01:43 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- A most astute observation. That should be in the ARRL RFI handbook if it isn't already. :-) Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ _______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00052.html (8,008 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI Radius vs Ant Height (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 02:10:40 -0000
Are you saying you cause RFI to 60 or 70 homes? Am I missing something here? Mike K9MI _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00054.html (9,790 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI Radius vs Ant Height (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on TowerTalk" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 23:54:25 -0400
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: In that case I should probaly rephrase that to: Although the laws of Physics show the higher you go the smaller the circle at ground level for a given intensity, for some strange re
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00060.html (8,462 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI Radius vs Ant Height (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 21:04:55 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Indeed you do. Of course you will also get all the phone calls too. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ _______________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00063.html (8,423 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI Radius vs Ant Height (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 21:06:45 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Easily, at that power level. If you've never operated high power, you will be surprised to find there is a threshold level for RFI which does not work in the a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00064.html (8,706 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI Radius vs Ant Height (score: 1)
Author: "Marc Wullaert ON4MA" <marc.wullaert3@pandora.be>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 08:23:01 -0000
Did you listen on a receiver when you where in the new house how about qrm this 60 or 70 houses can make to you :o( on4ma I http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=Rocklin+CA&ie=UTF8&ll=38.780237,-12
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00070.html (10,984 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI Radius vs Ant Height (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 07:38:14 -0400 (EDT)
A very important step in starting operation in a place like this is to put up the tower and antenna... but NOT connect the feedline for at least a week. That will give you a chance to find out who ha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00071.html (11,320 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI Radius vs Ant Height (score: 1)
Author: "Stone, Gary R." <Gary.Stone@va.gov>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 07:28:12 -0500
My experiences only: When I was using a Cushcraft A4S at 45 feet I had a little TVI trouble in my own house (no close neighbors). It showed up on some frequencies and was noticeable but not a real nu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00073.html (12,405 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI Radius vs Ant Height (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:03:10 -0500
I am wondering if it is the height or the more efficient antenna(s), or both. 73, Keith NM5G --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On B
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00083.html (12,999 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI Radius vs Ant Height (score: 1)
Author: Dave Fuller <rfcdma@spinn.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 10:05:05 -0600
For a given distance D to the antenna the field strength is proportional to 1/D(squared). In other words double the distance and you reduce field strength by 4. Will be different for "near field" are
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00084.html (9,436 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI Radius vs Ant Height (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 10:30:39 -0700
The near field for a HF antenna is surprisingly large, and doesn't have a lot to do with the physical size of the antenna. The classic (and somewhat arbitrary) definition of "near field" is the volum
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00090.html (12,288 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu