Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RE\:\s+Small\s+tribander\s+choice\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RE\:\s+Small\s+tribander\s+choice\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] RE: Small tribander choice (score: 1): Author: jimw@tstnet.com (Jim Worthington); Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 09:23:40 -0400; Thanks for your comments, Pete. The C3 appears to be the consensus favorite. My main concern with it is aesthetics. Having full size 20 elements, it is bigger (in one dimension) than the others and a; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00334.html (8,705 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] RE: Small tribander choice (score: 1): Author: jimw@tstnet.com (Jim Worthington); Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 10:09:48 -0400; Thanks, Mike. It looks like this might be the best choice. I'd be interested in comments from anyone who has tried the C3SS. - Jim AD4J -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Subm; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00335.html (7,977 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] RE: Small tribander choice (score: 1): Author: jimw@tstnet.com (Jim Worthington); Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 10:25:25 -0400; I'm looking carefully at the C-3SS. Has anyone got data on the bandwidth. The Force 12 Web page doesn't. I've sent for a brochure and emailed the same question to Force 12. - Jim AD4J -- FAQ on WWW:; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00337.html (8,426 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] RE: Small tribander choice (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 11:30:16 EDT; Then a very attractive alternative would be the C-3SS which has a smaller turning radius than the A-3 by 2 feet making it the smallest TR tribander around. It also has the best performance when compa; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00344.html (7,964 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] RE: Small tribander choice (score: 1): Author: W7TS@ibm.net (Ken Kinyon); Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 11:17:57 -0600; Hi Jim and all, I recently replaced a Mosley PRO-67C with a C3. I am extremely pleased with the performance. I am convinced it works better (I work more stations and get more positive comments) on 20; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00351.html (10,003 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]