Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RE\:\s+80\s+meter\s+4\s+square\s+array\s+notes\s+from\s+N0AH\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] RE: 80 meter 4 square array notes from N0AH (score: 1)
Author: n2tk@idsi.net (Tony kazmakites)
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 06:11:44 -0400
What is the general consensus for where the 4 square should be resonant? If you want to cover phone and cw, is it best to; - set spacing and length of 70 ohm lines to 3.650. Then resonate verticals a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00005.html (25,211 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] RE: 80 meter 4 square array notes from N0AH (score: 1)
Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 11:57:45 -0400
elevated feed Jim at Comtek recommends that all of the feedpoints be at the same level, but I'm not sure what happens if you don't do that. Presumably the pattern would be affected, but I don't know
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00015.html (9,071 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] RE: 80 meter 4 square array notes from N0AH (score: 1)
Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements)
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 12:17:15 -0500
If it were me, I would resonate and space the verticals for 3.510, and use switched capacitors to QSY to the SSB window. The caps are a much less lossier proposition than coils, and you have more ca
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00016.html (8,583 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] RE: 80 meter 4 square array notes from N0AH (score: 1)
Author: w7why@harborside.com (Tom Osborne)
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 17:55:55 -0700
Hi Ken If there are any farmers around your area, chances are you can get some irrigation tubing for a good price. I found some damaged sections just for the cost of hauling them away. 73 Tom W7WHY -
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00017.html (7,767 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] RE: 80 meter 4 square array notes from N0AH (score: 1)
Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 18:31:56 EDT
Greetings All I have recently constructed a 4 square for 80 meters. It has performed wonderfully so I thought I would share some notes about itFirst, a disclaimer- I'm not an engineer- my data is fro
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00534.html (20,213 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] RE: 80 meter 4 square array notes from N0AH (score: 1)
Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 00:34:40 -0400
Paul, Thanks for reporting your results in detail. They will be invaluable to anyone putting up a 4-square, especially on 80M. Just a few questions/comments: 35 I had some trouble visualizing this. A
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00545.html (15,667 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] RE: 80 meter 4 square array notes from N0AH (score: 1)
Author: 74237.2073@compuserve.com (James W. Fisher, Jr.)
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 08:39:38 -0400
This is an excellent thread. dick.green@valley.net writes on 31/08/99: least 1/2 wavelength from any metal structure, especially a tower.< However, where it is a tower (as opposed, say, to a metal bu
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00550.html (9,875 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] RE: 80 meter 4 square array notes from N0AH (score: 1)
Author: earlham@radiks.net (Iowaguy)
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 11:56:55 -0500
My compliments to Paul on a very nicely written and informative article. Great job Paul! Two years ago I put an 80 mtr 4 square here using the K8UR configuration ("Lazy H", or "bent dipole") shown in
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00560.html (24,218 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] RE: 80 meter 4 square array notes from N0AH (score: 1)
Author: ka5nez@clarc.org (Jeanni)
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 16:42:54 -0500
I am a little ways from putting up either a phased pair or a 4 Sq. on 80. I noticed that Jim, VE1JF is using the F12 verticals. I was curious if there is a consensus on which verticals are best for a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00569.html (8,544 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] RE: 80 meter 4 square array notes from N0AH (score: 1)
Author: DavisRFinc@aol.com (DavisRFinc@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 17:45:17 EDT
<< K4SQR, Jim, at Com Tek makes a great product and provided a lot of ideasit was nice to have a product actually work out of the box ...the hybred coupler and Jim's design have worked great! >> Ditt
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00570.html (8,725 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] RE: 80 meter 4 square array notes from N0AH (score: 1)
Author: k4sqr@juno.com (Jim MIller)
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 18:32:27 -0400
curious F12, Ken and Readers; Top loading is preferred for shortened verticals, then center coil loading, and last place is base coil loading. So the Force-12 linear models and the Gladiator Top Load
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00572.html (9,520 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu