Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RE\:\[Tower\-Talk\]A\s+SAD\s+Precedent\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RE\:\[Tower\-Talk\]A\s+SAD\s+Precedent\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] RE:[Tower-Talk]A SAD Precedent? (score: 1): Author: mlevine@compsol.net (Mark Levine, D.C.); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 11:22:55 -0500; Why do you people always blame the lawyers ? Who solicited whom in this case? Do you know ? Let's just bash the lawyers. How many of you live within the shadow of a cell tower ? I am in rural Connect; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00458.html (8,575 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] RE:[Tower-Talk]A SAD Precedent? (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 11:43:55 +0000; [snip] Have you ever watched daytime television? Every other TV Ad is a lawyer soliciting business. As they teach in Marketing 101, the key to success is repetition... -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet:; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00462.html (8,110 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] RE:[Tower-Talk]A SAD Precedent? (score: 1): Author: agray@voicenet.com (Alan D. Gray); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 12:46:20 -0500; Not to mention the ads for the doctors, dentists, accountants... --Original Message-- From: Barry Kutner <w2up@mindspring.com> To: Mark Levine, D.C. <mlevine@compsol.net>; towertalk@contesting.com <t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00467.html (8,831 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] RE:[Tower-Talk]A SAD Precedent? (score: 1): Author: K3AIR@aol.com (K3AIR@aol.com); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 21:48:39 EST; Simply because without these greedy bloodsuckers, none of these stupid claims would get very far. As an attorney I know has said, "it's 99% of lawyers that make the rest of us look bad." The USA is t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00481.html (8,086 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] RE:[Tower-Talk]A SAD Precedent? (score: 1): Author: agray@voicenet.com (Alan D. Gray); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 22:31:30 -0500; And be sure to recite this all over again for the benefit of the lawyer you ask to defend you :) = --Original Message-- From: K3AIR@aol.com <K3AIR@aol.com> To: towertalk@contesting.com <towertalk@con; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00484.html (9,199 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] RE:[Tower-Talk]A SAD Precedent? (score: 1): Author: n2tk@idsi.net (Tony Kazmakites); Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 06:15:04 -0500; I was asked to pull a message on this reflector that had to do with 160-10m receiver preamps because it was not in line with what this reflector is about. When I see several messages like the one bel; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00491.html (9,493 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] RE:[Tower-Talk]A SAD Precedent? (score: 1): Author: wx0b@arraysolutions.com (Jay, WX0B); Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 07:47:15 -0600; I'd rather contribute to a thread ABOUT reciever preamps. I think I just learned from W3LPL he uses beverages on 10m-20m and they have preamps. Whats the story with this. What are the preamp circuits; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00495.html (11,057 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]