Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RCS\-4\s+ant\.\s+switch\s+usable\s+on\s+6\s+Meters\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RCS\-4\s+ant\.\s+switch\s+usable\s+on\s+6\s+Meters\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] RCS-4 ant. switch usable on 6 Meters? (score: 1): Author: ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca (Mike & Coreen Smith); Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 19:15:40 -0400; Hi All, Am wondering if anyone knows the cutoff frequency for the RCS-4 remote antenna switch? I understand W8JI designed it(?) I sent Tom an Email direct a few days ago but no reply, so am going to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00380.html (8,120 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] RCS-4 ant. switch usable on 6 Meters? (score: 1): Author: k1ir@designet.com (Jim Idelson); Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 07:17:15 -0500; Hi Mike, What an opportunity to use your own technical skills. What do you need in the way of performance from that switch on 6m? Probably two things: acceptable LOSS and acceptable CROSSTALK. I'll b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00384.html (9,322 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] RCS-4 ant. switch usable on 6 Meters? (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 03:05:03 -0500; The old RCS-4 is unacceptable at 6 meters due to SWR and crosstalk. It has already been revised, and will be acceptable to 100MHz. The new unit should be out in a month or so, and now safely handles; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00390.html (7,736 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]