Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RADIALS\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RADIALS\s+\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] RADIALS ? (score: 1): Author: W6MR@pacbell.net (Joe Clement); Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 21:03:07 -0700; I have finished construction on my 80 mtr. 4 sq. and 2 1/4 wave 160 verticals. These antennas are both constructed out of 25g tower sections with elevated radials. I installed a few temporary radials; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00988.html (7,066 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] RADIALS ? (score: 1): Author: w7zrc@micron.net (Rod Greene); Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 06:32:36 -0600; Joe, In 1980 I constructed an 80 mtr 4 sq. out of some old aluminum pole sections. The radials were in the ground approx. 1 inch. The radials were all in the center of the 4 sq. because that's were I; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00991.html (7,854 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] RADIALS ? (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 14:10:11 -0400; Hi Joe, When I went from four elevated radials to a "real" ground system in two separate tests, FS picked up about 5 dB. When WVNJ radio went from six elevated radials to 100 radials, they picked up; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg01003.html (7,547 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]