- 1. [TowerTalk] Quad Design... (score: 1)
- Author: Dino Darling <k6rix@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:04:51 -0800
- Greetings! I rescued an old Cubex 2-element, tri-band quad. I would like to build a 2-element 20 meter beam centered on 14.250Mhz for Field Day. Knowing that this antenna is a compromise for the thre
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00420.html (7,716 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Quad Design... (score: 1)
- Author: SavageBR@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 07:48:58 EST
- Let me know if you do not get any takers. I'll be glad to do it for you. Bruce AA4Z _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wirel
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00422.html (6,841 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Quad Design... (score: 1)
- Author: "Floyd Sense" <sentek@sprintmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:14:44 -0500
- No reason to go with a boom that long. 8' is quite adequate and much easier to handle when erecting. K8AC be with _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "S
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00443.html (9,151 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Quad Design... (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Playford" <w8aef@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:40:04 -0000
- The 2 element quad will be great for working Europe or Asia. I suggest a 2 or 3 element yagi at 20-30 feet above ground level for working domestic contests. During the contest season I mount a Force
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00450.html (8,832 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] Quad Design... (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Playford" <w8aef@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 21:42:55 -0000
- Many years ago I had a 2 element 20m quad on a 6 foot boom at 90 feet. It was absolutely worthless on 20m and I am convinced that it was because the boom was too short. And I did adjust the driven el
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00453.html (8,822 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu