Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Passive\s+VHF\s+Satellite\s+relay\s+Antenna\s+Scheme\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Passive\s+VHF\s+Satellite\s+relay\s+Antenna\s+Scheme\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Passive VHF Satellite relay Antenna Scheme (score: 1): Author: David Jordan <wa3gin@erols.com>; Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 15:31:23 -0400; Hi Folks, Does anyone remember the old days of two to three TV channel reception? Does anyone remember when the local town geek who would go up to the top of the mountain and install two VHF antennas; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00343.html (8,228 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Passive VHF Satellite relay Antenna Scheme (score: 1): Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>; Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 14:49:39 -0500; Passive repeaters can be wonderful things. Often used in paging applications today, they extend coverage into hospitals, malls, etc. AT&T even used some on their long distance microwave system. No m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00345.html (7,699 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Passive VHF Satellite relay Antenna Scheme (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 02:42:36 +0000; WA2GIN asked: This is done here at UHF for TV. I used to live in an area where Gov't policy prevented sufficient coverage (land grant depends on population served), so remote villages rely on back-to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00355.html (9,601 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Passive VHF Satellite relay Antenna Scheme (score: 1): Author: Scott Townley <nx7u@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 20:09:28 -0700; The main thing to keep in mind with any passive repeater scheme is that path loss isn't additive--it's much worse than that. To illustrate: in free space, if the pathloss from point A to point B is 1; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00358.html (11,923 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]