Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+PL259\'s\s+and\s+heat\s+shrink\s+tubing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+PL259\'s\s+and\s+heat\s+shrink\s+tubing\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] PL259's and heat shrink tubing (score: 1): Author: "CRAIG CLARK" <jcclark@wildblue.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:01:56 -0400; Weatherproofing PL259 can be accomplished by various methods with commonly available products. We sell flooded heat shrink (HS) tubing for $5 for a 4 length ' and I use this product when requested by; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00270.html (8,065 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] PL259's and heat shrink tubing (score: 1): Author: Adam Shirley WJ4X <wj4x@amsat.org>; Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:21:11 -0400; I use 3m 2155 tape covered with a couple wraps of 33. Never get any water in my connections. The 2155 is a self fusing rubber splicing tape, and the 33 is a PVC regular electrical tape. Works great,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00271.html (9,001 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] PL259's and heat shrink tubing (score: 1): Author: "Brad Pioveson W9FX" <w9fx@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:13:44 -0500; A few decades of experience at waterproofing damaged and spliced trailing cables in underground mines yields the following methodology: 1. Wrap the area to be waterproofed with two layers of Scotch 3; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00273.html (9,235 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] PL259's and heat shrink tubing (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:33:59 +0100; After running the knife down the side, it does peel off, though with some effort. To make it clear, the heat shrink/glue treatment is only applied to ONE connector at a time, to reinforce and seal th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00277.html (8,357 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] PL259's and heat shrink tubing (score: 1): Author: Pete Michaelis - N8TR <pete.n8tr@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:46:19 -0400; I use the procedures described below by W9FX to seal splices with the exception of step 1 which I leave out. I find that the Scotch 130C conforms to the connector better than Scotch 33+ or the Scotch; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00285.html (11,236 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]