- 1. [TowerTalk] Optibeam 12-4 (score: 1)
- Author: "Anthony J. Cioffi \(N2KI\)" <n2ki@amsat.org>
- Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:55:04 -0400
- Is anyone using an Optibeam 12-4? I have a tuning question. Anthony - N2KI 30MDG - 1187 www.n2ki.com _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ To
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00269.html (6,462 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Optibeam 12-4 (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Weiss <s.weiss018@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 22:54:46 -0400
- Good evening to all, Looking for opinions and or advice on the Optibeam product. Particularly the OB12-4. I have a local and well respected ham/contester who loves the product. I've been to eham and
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00005.html (6,653 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Optibeam 12-4 (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy Alderman" <aldermant@windstream.net>
- Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 01:09:29 -0400
- Scott, I have the OB40-2 and the OB16-3, respectively being a 2-el 40m and a 16 element tri-bander. They have only been up a year but in my opinion, they are very good in both performance and mechani
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00007.html (8,758 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Optibeam 12-4 (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Kourey" <rkourey@carolina.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 01:19:30 -0400
- Scott, I cannot speak specifically to the OB 12-4 but let me share with you may experience with OB in general. I have in use the Optibeam 16-5 5-bander with the 2-element Optibeam 4030 stacked eleven
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00008.html (9,789 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] Optibeam 12-4 (score: 1)
- Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 01:15:32 -0700
- I also have the OB2-40 and the OB16-3. I fully agree that they are very strong and work exactly as specified. All of the parts are well marked, and even with a rather marginal manual it is pretty dif
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00009.html (9,933 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu