Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+OT\s+but\s+relevant\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+OT\s+but\s+relevant\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] OT but relevant (score: 1): Author: Kathy Bookmiller via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:01:43 +0000 (UTC); Sorry about this but it may affect many of us eventually. Yesterday I went for a stress test and got some bad results. I have a left bundle block and they want to me to have a pacemaker implanted ASA; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00276.html (8,355 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] OT but relevant (score: 1): Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@pcnet.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:17:30 -0500; A place to start: http://www.arrl.org/pacemaker -- Tom -- e-mail: frenaye@pcnet.com YCCC --> http://www.yccc.org/ Tom Frenaye, K1KI, P O Box J, West Suffield CT 06093 Phone: 860-668-5444 ____________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00277.html (8,855 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] OT but relevant (score: 1): Author: Bruce Jungwirth <k0son@frontiernet.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:44:11 -0600; You may want to contact Medtronic in the Minneapolis, Mn area. I think they have their own EMC lab in which they would have tested their units per the Medical Device Directive which requires radiated; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00278.html (9,521 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] OT but relevant (score: 1): Author: Mark Pride via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:03:32 +0000 (UTC); Interesting topic. I have a family member that has a pacemaker and one of the concerns I had of course, could I continue to play radio - KW's multi transmitter, etc. In a controlled experiment, I had; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00279.html (10,944 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] OT but relevant (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:16:52 -0800; No surprise at all. First, pacemakers are a mature technology, and there are many potential RFI sources in the public environment, not the least of which are cell phones, often in very close proximit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00280.html (9,390 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] OT but relevant (score: 1): Author: John Bohnovic <k4wj@att.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:36:20 -0500; I'm running a Medtronic unit and I don't even know it's there except for the little bump on my chest. I run 1.5 kw most mornings on 80 and 40 M CW. My Butternut HF-2V is about 75 feet from the shack.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00281.html (9,336 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] OT but relevant (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:45:08 -0500; It all depends. I have a defib with a pacemaker back-up. The only restriction was no cell phones in my shirt pocket. I can arc weld and run the legal limit on any band. It's been so long that I've fo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00282.html (10,737 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] OT but relevant (score: 1): Author: Charles Farr <cefarr@hughes.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:45:16 -0800; It would seem to me that strong EM signals, that might cause glitches in a pacemaker are a square law issue. Since most of us don't want our stations to emit RF into the shack environment, well-match; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00283.html (9,943 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] OT but relevant (score: 1): Author: Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:40:41 -0600; Roger, you should run the welding leads twisted together to form a twisted pair as much as possible. Bring the leads to the weld site from in front of you not past you to the site. Clamp the ground c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00284.html (11,918 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] OT but relevant (score: 1): Author: "AA6DX - Mark" <aa6dx@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:16:45 -0800; I have had a pacemaker for about 2 years now. I have had it checked, with no problems. I run full legal limit on HF most of the time, and operate 2M and Cell phone with no issues.. about 10 years ago; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00285.html (10,665 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] OT but relevant (score: 1): Author: Spencer <w1gak@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:59:15 -0700; I had a nuke. stress test and set off the U. S. Boarder Patrol radiation alarm on the way home. Shut the whole place down while they searched my car. The letter from the Dr. was of no use. PAY ATTENT; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00290.html (7,954 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] OT but relevant (score: 1): Author: Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:24:16 -0600; They probably thought you were an atomic bomb suicide bomber. Many are unaware but we developed small atomic bombs that fit in a backpack and could be easily hiked with by one man. Perhaps they thoug; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00292.html (9,235 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] OT but relevant (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stover <kevin.stover@mediacombb.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:07:37 -0600; Anecdotally when I was still working in a manufacturing plant we had a supervisor who was suddenly required to have one implanted. Young guy too. The guidelines given concerning the punch presses, sh; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00294.html (10,867 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] OT but relevant (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:45:45 -0800; This is ALWAYS good advice for preventing magnetic coupling. Magnetic coupling is proportional to the loop area formed by conductors carrying the current. Running them closely in parallel minimizes t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00296.html (9,566 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] OT but relevant (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 01:06:29 -0500; With MIG and TIG, or Plasma torch I don't get near to that current. With mine it just says to keep clear of the cables. I'll have to look up which one it is. They are so much easier, I haven't used a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00300.html (13,822 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] OT but relevant (score: 1): Author: "Earl Morse" <kz8e@wtd.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:46:54 -0800; I remember watching Medtronic testing their pacemakers at a lab we used to use in MN back in the day. I remember thinking that they were testing at ridiculously high levels at the time. The pacemaker; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00301.html (9,044 bytes)
17. Re: [TowerTalk] OT but relevant (score: 1): Author: Big Don <bigdon39@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 05:26:50 -0800; The results ot 1991 US Army testing of pacemakers in *EMP*,, are discussed in http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a242990.pdf At that time, the latest ones were OK, the old ones had problems....; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00302.html (9,999 bytes)
18. Re: [TowerTalk] OT but relevant (score: 1): Author: Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:37:50 -0600; The Army paper referenced was published in 1991. The devices being implanted now are of significantly newer design and likely better and surely different in RFI/EMI rejection. Medtronic issued a "Sta; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00307.html (11,407 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]