Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+OT\s+\?\?\s+\-\s+Manual\s+tuners\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+OT\s+\?\?\s+\-\s+Manual\s+tuners\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] OT ?? - Manual tuners (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller KG0KP" <JimMiller@STL-OnLine.Net>; Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 11:35:40 -0600; Settings, Not brand comparisons; (Dentron MT3000A, but that is not the question) If I am able to match my exciter to the antenna via a setting of -- and also at dial set at 50) with virtually the sam; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00413.html (7,106 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] OT ?? - Manual tuners (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 23:57:55 -0500; This should be covered in the manual. I know it is in the Palstar AT5K, but I don't happen to have the manual at had at the moment. I'll try and dig it out when I go back out. I've logged the setting; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00414.html (8,664 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] OT ?? - Manual tuners (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 01:32:24 -0700; I don't have the schematic for that tuner handy, but assuming it is a T-Network the most efficient setting will probably be the one where either the input or the output capacitance is closest to maxi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00416.html (9,006 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] OT ?? - Manual tuners (score: 1): Author: jpk5lad@cox.net; Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 23:37:48 -0600; Hi Jim -- I think the rule of thumb is, if you have a choice of tuning configurations, the one with more capacity and less inductance is the preferred one. Seems like I also remember reading that if; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00421.html (9,290 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] OT ?? - Manual tuners (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 07:25:23 -0800; I've been working on genetic algorithms to set stepped L/C networks for a variety of purposes (phased arrays and tuners), and have looked at W9CFs modeling and adjustment code. I don't think his code; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00431.html (10,717 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] OT ?? - Manual tuners (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 10:17:22 -0800; Hi Jim -- I think the rule of thumb is, if you have a choice of tuning configurations, the one with more capacity and less inductance is the preferred one. Seems like I also remember reading that if; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00433.html (8,109 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] OT ?? - Manual tuners (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller KG0KP" <JimMiller@STL-OnLine.Net>; Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:38:02 -0600; Just one of those things I always wondered about. Guess that says I don't have much to do when I get down to this. THANKS everybody. Good useful information. Interesting sites too. 73, de Jim KG0KP _; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00434.html (10,935 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] OT ?? - Manual tuners (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 14:11:54 -0600; The inductor generates heat; the caps do not. rob k5uj _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00435.html (7,944 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] OT ?? - Manual tuners (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:32:55 -0500; I've noticed the same result and my primary ATU is a remote-controlled switchable "L." Also component Q and total output C makes a substantial difference with C-L-C "T" tuners when low Z termination; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00436.html (8,959 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] OT ?? - Manual tuners (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:22:19 -0500; Sorry it took me a day to get this and I see you've received several answers already. There should be at least some difference in SWR and or output. The SWR is straight forward, if the SWR is the sam; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00440.html (10,823 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] OT ?? - Manual tuners (score: 1): Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:18:22 -0800; This thread has been of interest to me but I have often thought of trying to learn what is really going on when tuning the dials of the tuner. Does anyone know how helpful the ARRL book "The ARRL Gui; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00442.html (8,926 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] OT ?? - Manual tuners (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 20:42:40 -0700; I think in general that the lowest loss would occur with the lowest current through the inductor ... I'm not sure that always equates to the lowest inductance. Whether the maximum capacity should be; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00448.html (9,912 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] OT ?? - Manual tuners (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 20:05:53 -0800; I might think the opposite, small C = high impedance = high voltage _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00449.html (9,301 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]