- 1. [TowerTalk] OT: Phased Verticals with FCPs (score: 1)
- Author: "Marshall Stewart" <marsh@ka5m.net>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 14:28:56 -0600
- Has anyone put up a phased vertical array with each vertical using a separate FCP? If so, is there anything special about feeding the array? 73, Marsh, KA5M __________________________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00318.html (7,205 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] OT: Phased Verticals with FCPs (score: 1)
- Author: n8de@thepoint.net
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 15:41:00 -0500
- FCP? Has anyone put up a phased vertical array with each vertical using a separate FCP? If so, is there anything special about feeding the array? 73, Marsh, KA5M _____________________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00319.html (7,294 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] OT: Phased Verticals with FCPs (score: 1)
- Author: "Marshall Stewart" <marsh@ka5m.net>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 14:59:57 -0600
- Folded Counterpoise See http://www.w0uce.net/K2AVantennas.html FCP? _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@co
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00320.html (8,611 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] OT: Phased Verticals with FCPs (score: 1)
- Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 18:45:39 -0500
- If so, is there anything special about feeding the array? The feed point impedance for inverted Ls with FCPs (and double Ls, for that matter) will be different than for ground mounted verticals with
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00324.html (7,971 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu