Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+New\s+Scientist\s+\-\s+What\'s\s+wrong\s+with\s+the\s+Sun\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+New\s+Scientist\s+\-\s+What\'s\s+wrong\s+with\s+the\s+Sun\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] New Scientist - What's wrong with the Sun? (score: 1): Author: "Don Tucker" <w7wll@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:08:03 -0700; Tis not about antennas and towers but the reason we put 'em up. Interesting article re the (or lack of) new solar cycle. http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627640.800-whats-wrong-with-the-sun.ht; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-06/msg00328.html (6,849 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] New Scientist - What's wrong with the Sun? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 01:32:10 -0400; I'm surprised to see this in "The New Scientist" because it ignores so many points and hangs on so few. They talk about the sun and cold winter in Europe and completely ignore the record heat in Aust; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-06/msg00329.html (10,691 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]