Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+New\s+Discussion\:\s+Dipole\s+Secrets\s+Part\s+II\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] New Discussion: Dipole Secrets Part II (score: 1)
Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller)
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 09:04:24 -0500
Some of you guys out there should really start stand up comedy routines. What a hoot. The one about the witch doctor is rich! Anyway, as I read these wonderfull remarks from some really great guys, I
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00821.html (8,853 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] New Discussion: Dipole Secrets Part II (score: 1)
Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC)
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 10:26:22 EDT
Half wave slopers generally model better than low dipoles and much better than inverted vee's (for low angle). I've had very good success with half wave slopers from a 60' tower. Tom, K5RC/7 -- FAQ o
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00827.html (8,400 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] New Discussion: Dipole Secrets Part II (score: 1)
Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver)
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 07:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
Assuming we're talking 80-m here, I wouldn't bother with the low dipole except for regional coverage where a high radiation angle is a Good Thing. Low, horizontal wires aren't going to put much ener
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00829.html (9,701 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] New Discussion: Dipole Secrets Part II (score: 1)
Author: rudder1@ibm.net (Malcolm Clark)
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 10:49:34 +0000
[snip] [snip] OK, I found bobtail curtain in the ARRL Antenna Book. Assuming that is the bobtail you are referring to, what's a half bobtail? 73 Malcolm KR4HP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00831.html (8,285 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] New Discussion: Dipole Secrets Part II (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 11:03:57 -0400
The Handbook and Antenna Book both have tables of vertical radiation patterns for dipoles at various heights (in terms of wavelengths) above ground. Unfortunately, below 1/2 wavelength the patterns s
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00832.html (9,738 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] New Discussion: Dipole Secrets Part II (score: 1)
Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin)
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 16:42:13 -0500
anyone modeled swingsets, chain Lee, I have an inverted/drooping Vee with the apex at a bit over 60 feet. One leg extends down to the south-southeast towards the back fence and bisects , but is abov
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00846.html (9,787 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] New Discussion: Dipole Secrets Part II (score: 1)
Author: 107770.3462@compuserve.com (James P. Cassidy)
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 21:19:50 -0400
Ward, I am trying to visualize the scenario, do the 13 year olds have to stannd around waiting for beam headings and then run around the tower for new ones? 73 Jim KI7Y -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.cont
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00855.html (8,222 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] New Discussion: Dipole Secrets Part II (score: 1)
Author: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C)
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 22:38:51 -0400
Well, since 1 October 1997 I've worked S7, D6, FR5, 5R, H44, H40, KH2, 8Q7, UA9 and a bunch of less difficult stuff with a G5RV only 35 feet (10 meters) high. The antenna has a little droop to it, I
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00865.html (9,238 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] New Discussion: Dipole Secrets Part II (score: 1)
Author: kb3aug@juno.com (Bill Hinkle)
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 22:58:39 -0400
You will find this hard to believe, I did, so I worked him again to be sure. I worked 9X/RW3AH on 75 with a dipole that is at 20 feet off the ground from WV! I was so sure it was not real, I posted a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00869.html (11,885 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] New Discussion: Dipole Secrets Part II (score: 1)
Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 13:39:02 -0400
[N0AX responds:] Thing. While there is no disputing the fact that low dipoles and inverted vees on 80M have virtually no directional characteristics and are high-angle radiators, I would hesitate to
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00919.html (11,619 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] New Discussion: Dipole Secrets Part II (score: 1)
Author: kk7gw@hotmail.com (David Jones)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 12:45:42 PDT
8Q7, touches For me, with a 40m dipole at 25 feet, with maybe a 3 foot droop, I've worked around 85 countries since 13 April 1997 (when I got the new call). This includes countries like 9M6, VR2, KH
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00921.html (7,663 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu