Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+NVIS\s+160\s+Meters\s+\[Was\:\s+RE\:\s+\[NVIS\]\s+Digest\s+Number876\/NVIS\s+9n\s+160\s+Meters\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+NVIS\s+160\s+Meters\s+\[Was\:\s+RE\:\s+\[NVIS\]\s+Digest\s+Number876\/NVIS\s+9n\s+160\s+Meters\]\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] NVIS 160 Meters [Was: RE: [NVIS] Digest Number876/NVIS 9n 160 Meters] (score: 1): Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:30:54 -0400; Given the wavelength is there any reason to believe that the same antenna at 4-8 feet above ground would perform in a significantly different manner? I will be moving some fences around and am contem; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00817.html (8,277 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]