Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+NON\-INSULLATION\s+STRIKES\s+AGAIN\!\s+RG174\s+ANOMALLY\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] NON-INSULLATION STRIKES AGAIN! RG174 ANOMALLY (score: 1)
Author: "Larry - K7SV" <k7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 06:55:15 -0400
Some of you may remember my posting about our experience with beverages using plastic boxes to house matching transformers. The black plastic boxes turned out to be conductive which obviously led to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00064.html (8,682 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] NON-INSULLATION STRIKES AGAIN! RG174 ANOMALLY (score: 1)
Author: Neal Campbell <nealk3nc@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:56:11 -0400
Could be why it was being sold at Mendelsons! Neal Campbell Abroham Neal Software www.dxbase.com www.abrohamnealsoftware.com www.sdrsystems.com (540) 242 0911 Amateur Radio: K3NC Blog: http://www.abr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00068.html (9,711 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] NON-INSULLATION STRIKES AGAIN! RG174 ANOMALLY (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:10:54 -0700
Larry, How thick is the black conductive layer underneath the stranded coppper shield? I wonder if that black conductive layer is thin enough to be equivalent to the foil shield that you see on doubl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00069.html (9,495 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] NON-INSULLATION STRIKES AGAIN! RG174 ANOMALLY (score: 1)
Author: "D.W. Fearn" <dwfearn@dwfearn.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 20:40:08 -0400
I was using RG-174 as a shielded lead in a product we build and experienced exactly the same problem as Larry describes. This was from a brand-new, very expensive roll of Belden RG-174. This was to t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00075.html (9,770 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] NON-INSULLATION STRIKES AGAIN! RG174 ANOMALLY (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 10:39:22 +0000
This sounded odd so I pulled out my belden catalog... and sure enough, right at the beginning of the coaxial cable section are these 3 'low noise' cables. 174/u type 8239 description: bare copper cov
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00077.html (12,015 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] NON-INSULLATION STRIKES AGAIN! RG174 ANOMALLY (score: 1)
Author: Eugene Jensen <eugenejensen@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 19:01:57 -0400
I remember some years back about a rf cable being made for audio work. I don't remember the particulars but it had to do with high end. I removed all the pl259 from them and reused them. (I know it b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00084.html (11,393 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu