Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Multi\-band\s+HF\s+antenna\s+replacement\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Multi-band HF antenna replacement (score: 1)
Author: "J. Paul Lyet" <jpl3@ptd.net>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 12:19:18 -0400
2 years ago my Tri-Ex tower collapsed (broken cable) with Mosley Pro 67B atop. Tower totalled, of course, and it's replacment was erected on Memorial Day! The 10 year old 67B (138# w/ 3'' boom) suffe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00543.html (8,330 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Multi-band HF antenna replacement (score: 1)
Author: "J. Paul Lyet" <jpl3@ptd.net>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 15:27:42 -0400
2 years ago my Tri-Ex tower collapsed (broken cable) with Mosley Pro 67B atop. Tower totalled, of course, and it's replacment was erected on Memorial Day! The 10 year old 67B (138# w/ 3'' boom) suffe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00544.html (7,925 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Multi-band HF antenna replacement (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:51:38 EDT
67B atop. Tower totalled, of course, and it's replacment was erected on Memorial Day! The 10 year old 67B (138# w/ 3'' boom) suffered relatively minor damage: boom with minimal flex distortion, 4 tra
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00013.html (9,376 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Multi-band HF antenna replacement (score: 1)
Author: K4RO Kirk Pickering <k4ro.tcg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:40:02 -0500
Here is a spot from last weekend. Using a 19 year-old Mosley PRO-57A antenna, I copied a European running 50 milli-Watts under world wide DX contest conditions. F5MUX 14035.9 K4RO gd ears 50 mW here
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00025.html (8,433 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Multi-band HF antenna replacement (score: 1)
Author: <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 09:14:03 -0700
That's a very flawed comment. Reception is a function of signal-to-noise ratio, not absolute gain. People can hear great with all sorts of receiving antennas (small loops, beverages, etc) that make h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00032.html (9,451 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Multi-band HF antenna replacement (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 09:55:53 -0700
I strongly agree, Dave. Steve and Ward did very careful measurements of these antennas in a well controlled test setup. My Beverages hear very well too, but they'd make lousy transmit antennas. 73, J
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00033.html (8,417 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Multi-band HF antenna replacement (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 10:13:46 -0700
I'll stick my neck out and play devils advocate here. Kirk does very well in contests and always seems to have a good signal on the bands. AC1O/4 used one of those big Moseley beams when he was activ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00034.html (9,645 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Multi-band HF antenna replacement (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 10:23:23 -0700
As I recall, Steve and Ward considered that possibility when the result was so poor and measured a second sample! I'm going from memory. Steve can fill us in. 73, Jim K9YC ___________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00037.html (8,613 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Multi-band HF antenna replacement (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:28:10 EDT
was so poor and measured a second sample! I'm going from memory. Steve can fill us in. The antenna inconsistency that we encountered had to do with the Monroe, WA, built KT34XA's (just before they we
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00046.html (9,395 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Multi-band HF antenna replacement (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:03:16 -0700
So does that mean you and Ward only tested 1 of the Mosley antennas, Steve? (I don't recall offhand). Mike W4EF........... _______________________________________________ ____________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00049.html (9,230 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Multi-band HF antenna replacement (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 01:03:01 -0400
The test reports I have seen show data on three Mosley models: the TA-33, Pro-77 and Pro-57B. Similarly, there are two Hy-Gain models, two Force-12 models and one each from CushCraft, Bencher, and K
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00057.html (11,197 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Multi-band HF antenna replacement (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:04:49 EDT
Steve? (I don't recall offhand). No, we tested 2 or 3 of them. I think the old traditional TA-33 did the best or at least as well as the rest of them (going by memory here). Cheers, Steve K7LXC **Sho
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00063.html (8,790 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] Multi-band HF antenna replacement (score: 1)
Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 17:02:19 +0000
When these yagi comparison test results were first announced ( I think I remember the talk at Dayton several years ago) it really got me thinking - IS IT POSSIBLE that there could be an antenna model
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00077.html (9,465 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Multi-band HF antenna replacement (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
Yes, people can and do work DX for years not knowing how bad their antenna is. Can you say "Gotham"? Maybe hardly anyone has a comparison dipole, but I do. I religiously A/B with it whenever trying a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00080.html (9,292 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] Multi-band HF antenna replacement (score: 1)
Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:27:31 -0400
As I recall the discussion at Dayton the year the tests were done, the "knock" on the methodology was that the measurements were necessarily made at an elevation angle of zero (no helicopter availabl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00090.html (7,385 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu