- 1. [TowerTalk] Mosley Pro 95 (score: 1)
- Author: Stephanie WX3K" <wx3k@ptd.net (Stephanie WX3K)
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 07:50:41 -0400
- I have one very nice Mosley Pro 95 recently removed from a 60 foot tower. The beam is in good condition. It was removed from the top of a self supporting tower and very carefully lowered wih an elect
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00377.html (7,866 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Mosley Pro 95 (score: 1)
- Author: Stephanie WX3K" <wx3k@ptd.net (Stephanie WX3K)
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 23:15:42 -0400
- Thanks all for responding.......I have decided to keep the monster.......It is going up on my tower this summer.......The Pro 95 is a far cry from a TH3JR and gives me 2 additional bands to work. I r
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00649.html (7,405 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Mosley Pro 95 (score: 1)
- Author: Stephanie WX3K" <wx3k@ptd.net (Stephanie WX3K)
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 23:28:41 -0500
- I acquired a Mosley Pro 95 beam......9 elements...20 through 10.....a monster compared to my TH3JR I presently have a 60 foot Rohn 25G guyed top and middle and bracked to the house. Is it possible to
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00502.html (8,071 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Mosley Pro 95 (score: 1)
- Author: Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:00:17 -0800
- Hi Stephanie, I am not sure of the boom length or wind surface area of the Pro95, but it sounds like its comparable to other big tribanders like the Hy-Gain TH7 or KLM KT34XA. If this is the case, th
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00504.html (9,772 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] Mosley Pro 95 (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:54:50 EST
- Maybe. What's your county windspeed? What's your state and county? You can look it up on our website under Tech Notes - <A HREF="www.championradio.com">www.championradio.com</A> If your guying and ho
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00509.html (8,404 bytes)
- 6. [TowerTalk] Mosley Pro 95 (score: 1)
- Author: thompson@mindspring.com (thompson@mindspring.com)
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 11:27:20 -0500
- The Pro 95 is just a 20 to 10 antenna without any 40 meter elements. There is one mounted on Rohn 25 in South Georgia that you can see from I-75 at a truck stop. I went and looked at it and the Rohn
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00510.html (8,051 bytes)
- 7. [TowerTalk] Mosley Pro 95 (score: 1)
- Author: Stephanie WX3K" <wx3k@ptd.net (Stephanie WX3K)
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 23:44:54 -0500
- Thanks all who have commented, both good and bad. I have heard the negative press about this antenna.........The Mosley I am taking down has very good SWR curves on 5 bands........So I know potential
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00523.html (8,533 bytes)
- 8. Re[2]: [TowerTalk] Mosley Pro 95 (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Otto <N8NGA@one.net> (Bob Otto)
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 00:35:48 -0500
- Hello Stephanie, There is some definitive data for you to review. Here's the description of the publication. HF TRIBANDER PERFORMANCE - TEST METHODS & RESULTS 2nd Edition This groundbreaking test too
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00526.html (10,545 bytes)
- 9. [TowerTalk] Mosley Pro 95 (score: 1)
- Author: thorh@worldnet.att.net (Thor Hallen)
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 00:35:42 -0800
- Stephanie: I would be far more interested in the customer support reputation of the companies than small differences in specifications that have no practical impact on the antenna's effectiveness. In
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00528.html (9,332 bytes)
- 10. [TowerTalk] Mosley Pro 95 (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:23:17 EST
- Gee - funny you should ask. The report N0AX and myself wrote did just that. We compared a dozen tribanders on the air and reported the results. The report is about 80 pages of protocol, data sets and
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00538.html (8,587 bytes)
- 11. [TowerTalk] Mosley Pro 95 (score: 1)
- Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan or Patricia Griffiths)
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 11:38:12 -0800
- I think we disagree on this one, Steve. You say the limiting factor to tower capacity is leg compression. I can't think of a single tower failure I have ever heard of due to too much leg compression.
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00554.html (10,321 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu