- 1. [TowerTalk] More on Insurance and Towers (score: 1)
- Author: garyejones@cmaaccess.com
- Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 05:41:29 -0800
- Here is an issue that you may need to think about also. At my last QTH, I owned ~ 9.5 acres. I had two towers up in the 2 acres behind my house. One tower was 120 feet of Rohn 45 and the other was a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00001.html (9,762 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] More on Insurance and Towers (score: 1)
- Author: Gareth <gareth@capecod.net>
- Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 10:49:43 -0500
- garyejones@cmaaccess.com wrote: Here is an issue that you may need to think about also. At my last QTH, I owned ~ 9.5 acres. I had two towers up in the 2 acres behind my house. One tower was 120 feet
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00002.html (10,761 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] More on Insurance and Towers (score: 1)
- Author: "K8RI on TowerTalk" <tower@charter.net>
- Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 13:12:32 -0500
- <snip> Now, the point of my story. When I called the insurance agent to start the claim, and the adjuster got there, I discovered that all "non attached structures" were totaled into one figure and t
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00004.html (11,056 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu