Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Minimum\s+Elevated\s+Vertical\s+Height\s+\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Minimum Elevated Vertical Height ? (score: 1)
Author: douglas.snowden@med.va.gov
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:28:38 -0400
I am going put up a Bobtail Curtain, but before I do it, I want to put up an elevated vertical (low ground plane?) so I will have a comparison. I am going to use it on 40M. So, what is your experienc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00198.html (6,971 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Minimum Elevated Vertical Height ? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <w8aef@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 19:21:33 -0000
I have my 40m 4sq installed 9 feet above ground with elevated radials at that height and am very happy with it's performance. de Paul, W8AEF an use _______________________________________________ See
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00203.html (8,103 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Minimum Elevated Vertical Height ? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:04:00 -0400
the loss reaches Doug, There are two loss mechanisms with elevated radials. The first is a "push against" loss. For every ampere flowing up into the antenna an exactly equal current must flow into t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00212.html (9,634 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Minimum Elevated Vertical Height ? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <w8aef@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:26:37 -0000
For my 40m 4sq I use the top rail from chain link fencing (1 3/8" dia x 10 feet long) to support the elements. The far end of each radial is supported at the top of a 4' long aluminum tube that slide
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00216.html (9,211 bytes)

5. RE: [TowerTalk] Minimum Elevated Vertical Height ? (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck Dietz" <w5pr@swbell.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:18:37 -0500
--Original Message-- ends away from earth. How high do you think the lower end of a vertical dipole for 75 meters should be to be reasonably efficient? 8-10 feet? Or would I still need a ground scree
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00217.html (7,779 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Minimum Elevated Vertical Height ? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:56:06 -0400
for 75 meters would I still need a Modeling programs have the largest error when used in situations like this (an actual measurement by Haagn and Barker of low dipoles show losses were significantly
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00218.html (8,873 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu